Wow, it's been 3 months since an update. Things got a bit hectic in my basement lab this winter. Water service broke under the house and partially flooded the basement. Luckily the plumbers and restoration folks moved quickly and damage was minimal. I had to replace padding under the carpet and my Ikea Billy bookcases were damaged from the water. But as I store everything in plastic bins, nothing in my wargaming stuff or my wife's yarn stash was damaged. Did have to move it all out to the garage while the basement was restored. Everything is dried out, no mold, carpet is back down and new bookcases have been installed. While I had everything moved out, I relocated my painting area. Several years ago I had made a craft space for my wife in a 12x12 alcove in the basement. The "Handmade Afghan Project for Our Wounded Soldiers" took over several years ago and she had not been using the space and my eye kept wandering to it. Being the lovely person she is, she let me move in to her space. What a gal!
But now it is snowing buckets outside, I'm home from work and will likely be off Monday too. So I must paint. Just finished KGL Hussars from AB Miniatures and I think I'll start on British Rifles next.
Got to get back to taking pictures too, now that the basement is back in order.
Friday, February 5, 2010
Saturday, October 24, 2009
A Leader of Men
So I just received and read a set of mini rules from Task Force Publishing, http://www.tfpgames.com/ , called "A Leader of Men."
Looks very good on first read. Has several features I like such as a strong command and morale mechanisms and otherwise simple firing and movement mechanisms. The other thing I like about the rules is there is no need for special rules for Germans behaving differently than Russians or other silly fluff. A German Rifle-mg stand shoots and moves like a Russian rifle-mg stand. Differences between forces are covered by the various morale and quality ratings and the turn-activation sequence.
The rules do use card activation, which I don't usually care for when it is just a rules gimmick, but the designer of "A Leader of Men" thought a lot and designed the game around the card activation system. The game will tend to draw focus and action on where the fighting is most intense (i.e. stands are closest) and if this focus is not getting a player closer to his objective, then in effect the player has lost control of events and will need to strive mightily to shift the focus back to where it needs to be.
The game runs by pulling a card, a player activates a unit that then takes morale checks, rally checks, moves and fires and can modify these actions with the unit commander's command points. Sort of like the Ambush Alley or Two-Hour Wargames sequence, but the whole things reads a lot easier and should play easier. At least for someone just starting a set of rules.
The rules do suffer from multiple terms for the same checks in both the rules and quick reference sheet which serve to confuse the reader. But a careful reading of the examples included in the rules will clear up that confusion. Also, the movement rate for infantry does not seem be defined anywhere in the rules but I'm sure an email to the author or the game forums would reveal that answer. Over all, the rules will receive no award for the best written, but the designer's intent still comes through clear.
It looks to be a wild and woolly game system with units (platoon of 4-8 stands) being easily affected by morale and command problems but, if not quite as easily, also brought back on the firing line. A players troops, under the stress of combat, may decide to fall back or go to ground despite what the owning player wants them to do. Makes a player want to keep a small reserve to exploit those times when the enemy falters and you need a fresh force to throw into the breach. Or plug a whole in your own defenses when a well placed artillery rounds takes out your key MG nest.
Basing is general so forces bases for FoW, Crossfire, or Poor Bloody Infantry will work well. Typically, these rules use 3-5 figures mounted on a stand. Individually based 28mm can work to by just keeping 3-5 figures in base to base contact to represent a "stand."
I look forward to running a game with these rules one day soon.
Looks very good on first read. Has several features I like such as a strong command and morale mechanisms and otherwise simple firing and movement mechanisms. The other thing I like about the rules is there is no need for special rules for Germans behaving differently than Russians or other silly fluff. A German Rifle-mg stand shoots and moves like a Russian rifle-mg stand. Differences between forces are covered by the various morale and quality ratings and the turn-activation sequence.
The rules do use card activation, which I don't usually care for when it is just a rules gimmick, but the designer of "A Leader of Men" thought a lot and designed the game around the card activation system. The game will tend to draw focus and action on where the fighting is most intense (i.e. stands are closest) and if this focus is not getting a player closer to his objective, then in effect the player has lost control of events and will need to strive mightily to shift the focus back to where it needs to be.
The game runs by pulling a card, a player activates a unit that then takes morale checks, rally checks, moves and fires and can modify these actions with the unit commander's command points. Sort of like the Ambush Alley or Two-Hour Wargames sequence, but the whole things reads a lot easier and should play easier. At least for someone just starting a set of rules.
The rules do suffer from multiple terms for the same checks in both the rules and quick reference sheet which serve to confuse the reader. But a careful reading of the examples included in the rules will clear up that confusion. Also, the movement rate for infantry does not seem be defined anywhere in the rules but I'm sure an email to the author or the game forums would reveal that answer. Over all, the rules will receive no award for the best written, but the designer's intent still comes through clear.
It looks to be a wild and woolly game system with units (platoon of 4-8 stands) being easily affected by morale and command problems but, if not quite as easily, also brought back on the firing line. A players troops, under the stress of combat, may decide to fall back or go to ground despite what the owning player wants them to do. Makes a player want to keep a small reserve to exploit those times when the enemy falters and you need a fresh force to throw into the breach. Or plug a whole in your own defenses when a well placed artillery rounds takes out your key MG nest.
Basing is general so forces bases for FoW, Crossfire, or Poor Bloody Infantry will work well. Typically, these rules use 3-5 figures mounted on a stand. Individually based 28mm can work to by just keeping 3-5 figures in base to base contact to represent a "stand."
I look forward to running a game with these rules one day soon.
Paining Up Soviet WWII Troops
Over the past week, I've been very busy . . . Partisan Brigade, 4x KV-85, 6x T-70, 6x BA-64, 2x GAZ-67, 4x Wagons, 6x Limbers. Vehicles are Battle Honors/Quality Castings 15mm, partisans are Eureka 15mm.
Thursday, October 22, 2009
More KV-85 and the Photo Setup
Worked with the Canon Rebel to see if I could get decent shots of 15mm infantry. Nothing worth posting so far. Going back to my Olympus 3MPixel camera, I got some better shots of recently painted armor. Again 15mm Battle Honors/Quality Casting models. Need more focal depth (treads out of focus) and need to straighten that barrel!
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
WWII Soviets and a Better Photography Setup
Been busy this past week painting Soviet vehicles. Also setup a light box to improve photography but I still need to work at it some more. Light is uneven because of two different wattage bulbs (I'll correct that tomorrow), and still working on the camera settings. Camera is an old 3 megapixel Olympus. Once I get that camera squared away, I'll try the Canon Rebel SLR. Ooo-yeah. Anyway, here's some pics. Minis are all Battle Honors/Quality Casting 15mm.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
The Score on The Border
We are currently in our "January 1525" Campaign Turn.
Here's the score from Raids and Hot Trods along the most murderous border . . .
Raid #1: The Bournes sent two Heidman agin The Armstrangs. The Armstrangs were plundered, lauched a Hot Trod and were kicked to the dirt, lost a heidman that was ransomed back. Score: Bournes +95, Armstrangs -91
Raid #2 The Armstrangs sent Sim Armstrang to raid the Bournes. The Bournes rode down the hapless Armstrangs in a very Hot Trod. Score Armstrangs -84, Bournes +95.
Raid #3 The Scotts sent 3 heidman a-raidin upon the Bournes. Score Scotts +97, Bournes -37
The other riding families stayed home near their warm hearths.
So after one month of Border Mayhem, the cumulative scores are:
Bourne: 153
Scott: 97
Patton: 0
Charlton: 0
Hapless Armstrang: -175
Players need to give me their heidman assignments for February 1525
Here's the score from Raids and Hot Trods along the most murderous border . . .
Raid #1: The Bournes sent two Heidman agin The Armstrangs. The Armstrangs were plundered, lauched a Hot Trod and were kicked to the dirt, lost a heidman that was ransomed back. Score: Bournes +95, Armstrangs -91
Raid #2 The Armstrangs sent Sim Armstrang to raid the Bournes. The Bournes rode down the hapless Armstrangs in a very Hot Trod. Score Armstrangs -84, Bournes +95.
Raid #3 The Scotts sent 3 heidman a-raidin upon the Bournes. Score Scotts +97, Bournes -37
The other riding families stayed home near their warm hearths.
So after one month of Border Mayhem, the cumulative scores are:
Bourne: 153
Scott: 97
Patton: 0
Charlton: 0
Hapless Armstrang: -175
Players need to give me their heidman assignments for February 1525
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)